After the Presidential debate on Friday I went to Blockbuster, and I ended up checking out Fahrenheit 9/11 since I hadn't seen it yet. I liked The Big One and Bowling for Columbine, and I was definitely interested in seeing Fahrenheit also. Overall, I liked the movie more at the end than I did at the beginning. I think that a lot of the points that he makes in the movie are well done, and I think that they are pretty well supported. My problem with the movie did start near the beginning of the movie because I think that the subject matter in the movie was strong enough already, and that shots of President Bush and other politicians getting their hair done before a speach was unnecessary. I think that voice overs of Michael Moore saying "Was Bush thinking..." and shots from Dragnet were also unnecessary. These are definitely part of Michael Moore's style, but when the movie is about the President starting an unjustified war, greed, and the administration using scare tactics it only came across as leading the audience. The movie needed to be able to sway even Bush supporters to see his point of view, and have a solid enough foundation to support the accusations that he was making. I think that most of his points are supported, but doing voice overs I think gave a little bit of a "spoon feeding" approach instead of letting the footage speak for itself. Bush may have been thinking the things that Michael Moore said, but he should have stuck to facts instead of just hypothesizing. That's my main problem because it ends up taking away from the credibility of the movie, which already comes into question because of Michael Moore's "liberal" political beliefs. The end became a little bit stronger because of the interviews with soldiers, and interviews with President Bush that were left to stand more on their own. And that's my review. :)